C-503 Democratic Local Nomination Act

On Wednesday, May 1st, 2013 in Uncategorized


This enactment amends the Canada Elections Act to require that, where a political party has an electoral district association in a riding, a prospective candidate for the riding must have their nomination papers signed by the chief executive officer and by one board member of the electoral district association in order to stand as that party’s candidate.


An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (local endorsement of candidate)

Whereas, since 1970, the Canada Elections Act has established the formal roles and responsibilities of political parties and their leaders in federal elections, including the requirement that the leader of a political party or their designated representative sign the nomination papers for a prospective candidate;

Whereas this requirement was originally intended to ensure that the prospective candidate was properly authorized by that party, but has subsequently been used by party leaders to exert power over prospective candidates, as well as elected Members of Parliament, and to overrule the preferences of local electoral district associations;

And whereas this requirement, insofar as it gives party leaders the power to refuse to allow a sitting Member of Parliament to be a candidate for that party in a future election, is being used as an undemocratic tool for discipline and control over Members and, as such, thwarts the will and interests of both the Member and their constituents and threatens the integrity of Canadian democracy;

Now, therefore, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:

Short Title

1. This Act may be cited as the Democratic Local Nomination Act.

2000, c. 9


2. Paragraph 67(4)(c) of the Canada Elections Act is replaced by the following:

(c) an instrument in writing
(i) that is signed by the chief executive officer and by one board member of the political party’s electoral district association for the electoral district in which the prospective candidate is seeking nomination and that states that the prospective candidate is endorsed by that electoral district association to stand as that party’s candidate in accordance with section 68, or
(ii) that, if a political party does not have an electoral district association in the relevant electoral district before the beginning of the election period, is signed by the leader of the political party or by a person referred to in subsection 383(2) and that states that the prospective candidate is endorsed by the party in accordance with section 68.

3. Subsection 383(2) of the Act is replaced by the following:

Endorsement of candidates

(2) A registered party and an eligible party, whose electoral district associations endorse candidates in their electoral districts at a general election in accordance with subparagraph 67(4)(c)(i) or whose leader has designated a representative to endorse candidates at a general election in the circumstances described in subparagraph 67(4)(c)(ii), shall include with the statement or report referred to in subsection (1) a statement certified by its leader that sets out the names of the designated representatives.

Print this page

  • http://twitter.com/kenpusha K Fry

    what a dumb government… except you Ms. May! I really appreciate you informing those of us who still care for Kanata… <3

    • deh3

      The provincial and federal governments care comparatively little for Kanata due to being continually underrepresented in the provincial and federal legislatures arising from faster-than-average population growth.

  • Hugh McPherson

    Brava! An excellent start at giving Canadians their voices back. Bonne Chance!

  • http://www.facebook.com/carter.apps Carter Apps

    While I agree this improves democracy what happens when an EDA makes a very bad choice and a Candidate goes rogue? How does the party react to limit damage caused by the Candidate using our name?

    • http://twitter.com/ACMESalesRep ACME Sales Rep.

      The party can still expel him or her from caucus and the local riding association can choose not to endorse the candidate in future elections. (And what do you mean by “our” name? Surely you mean “its”?)

  • Jeannie

    Thanks for taking steps to bring democracy back to Canada!

  • Richard Perriment

    Excellent news! take back our country, and restore it to the people!

  • Wilf_Day

    May 1st, 2013: update, please?

  • David Jeffrey Spetch

    Your private members bill looks like a small step but a step in the right direction but let’s be honest … The way political parties work, if you are not on board with the leader of the party whether you have their endorsement or not, you are pretty much ousted and likely mauled with the type of abuse which is your word against mine or non provable of others in a court. Which leaves one to wonder, is it political parties that need to be dissolved while all members become private ;)

How you can help

Follow Me

facebook-icon Facebook Twitter YouTube Digg


Learn how to support Elizabeth May with her work in Parliament ALT

Latest Articles

Ottawa Citizen: Trudeau must step up on climate change at G20 summit
July 5th, 2017

Island Tides: Movement for Oceans
June 22nd, 2017

Policy Magazine: The Slow Pace of Parliament
June 21st, 2017

Hill Times: The Liberals’ climate plan? A chocolate cake diet
June 7th, 2017

Policy Magazine: A Green Balance of Power in BC
May 15th, 2017

Island Tides: Another Liberal promise about to be broken on Canada’s navigable waters?
April 27th, 2017

Green Party Logo

Constituency Office

1-9711 Fourth St
Sidney, BC  V8L 2Y8

Phone: 250-657-2000
Fax: 250-657-2004

E-mail: elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca

Parliament Hill Office

518 Confederation Building
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON  K1A 0A6

Phone: 613-996-1119
Fax: 613-996-0850

E-mail: elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca

Jobs & Volunteering

Click here for the latest opportunities