Click here to read the submission.

The post Light-duty and Heavy-duty Vehicles and Engines, Emissions Reduction Plan appeared first on Elizabeth May.

Speaker: Ms. May
Time: 04/02/2021 15:08:59
Context: Question

Ms. Elizabeth May (Saanich—Gulf Islands, GP): Mr. Speaker, yesterday in question period, the Prime Minister said he was “pleased to see the U.S. follow our lead on banning fossil fuel subsidies.” Liberals promised in 2015 to end fossil fuel subsidies and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. On the contrary, though, between 2014 and 2018, both went up. Greenhouse gas emissions were up and fossil fuel subsidies were up, even before adding the $17 billion for Trans Mountain.

My question to my Liberal friends is: how is the vertigo that they are now experiencing from no longer being able to discern up from down?

Hon. Jonathan Wilkinson (Minister of Environment and Climate Change, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, in November our government introduced a climate plan that demonstrates how Canada will exceed its Paris agreement targets and will create jobs and economic prosperity for the future. As part of this our government is committed to phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies by 2025, and we are on track to do so. We were pleased to see the Americans follow our lead in committing to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. Canada has already eliminated eight tax measures in that sector, and we are working with Argentina on a peer review of fossil fuel subsidies. Our government will continue working with Canadians to cut pollution and to grow our economy.

The post When it comes to fossil fuel subsidies and GHG emissions, Liberals don’t know up from down appeared first on Elizabeth May.

I have been thinking a lot lately about the nature of Canadian federation and the challenges, in so many areas of public policy, caused by jurisdictional boundaries and sensitivities.

In managing the COVID pandemic, it is very clear that we are ill-served by having divided responsibilities. For example, the federal government must contract and purchase vaccines. But delivering the vaccines is provincial jurisdiction.

So far the federal government has spent $1 billion on vaccines from seven different manufacturers for a total of 414 million doses. Two have been approved so far – Pfizer (for 76 million doses) and Moderna (for 56 million doses) – with more contracts from other companies once approved by Health Canada.

It is true we have committed contracts for more doses/capita than any other G7 country. But it is also true that the rate at which Canadians are being vaccinated lags behind many other countries. The best global vaccination rate is in Israel, which has set up 150 vaccination clinics. Compare that to Ontario which has set up 15 vaccination sites. (A quick note to forestall a flood of complaints. It is contrary to international law that Israel has not provided vaccinations to Palestinians in Occupied Territories. So I am not praising their record. And I agree with this finding from the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Palestinian Human Rights.

We watch as federal and provincial finger pointing seems to outpace vaccination rates.

Some provinces are doing a better job of protecting teachers in school than are others. I support BC Greens leader Sonia Furstenau (by the way, a former school teacher) in calling for the BC government to put in place a masks policy in schools (sign here! Masks in schools – BC Green Party)

Meanwhile, the death toll mounts in long term care (LTC). So far, of the nearly 19,000 deaths due to COVID across Canada, over 70% have been in LTC homes.

We know what must be done. Green Leader Annamie Paul held a brilliant expert panel on LTC setting out the necessary immediate steps to save lives.

But is it really down to the provinces to act? Is there nothing for the federal government to do to save lives? Well, there is an act expressly for this purpose. It is called the Emergencies Act.

Passed by Parliament in 1985, it replaced the War Measures Act. From the moment I pulled it off the government website and read it last March, I was convinced it was what we needed to deal with the pandemic. Have a look and see what you think.

Originally, the Trudeau Cabinet was looking at invoking it. Once invoked, parliament would have to meet within seven days to debate whether it was needed and Parliament would have rights of oversight over the temporary measures. If the government wanted to, it could limit the extent of its new emergency powers to getting inside LTC homes and taking over protection of staff and residents.

Back in the spring, as soon as provincial governments heard the Emergencies Act might be used, they pushed back and Trudeau dropped the idea. I asked Health Minister Patty Hajdu about it again last week. She may be right in saying that the government is making better progress in dealing with the pandemic by keeping relations with the provinces collaborative. But people are dying in LTC at higher rates in Canada than in any other OECD country. We know this is without a doubt the responsibility of the provinces. How many deaths are justified in order to maintain good relations with the provinces? (Personally, I would say “none.”)

Meanwhile, we have the same “blame game” in climate debates. The federal government pretends it cannot do much to limit GHG without provincial cooperation. It is true cooperation would be the best way forward, but it is not true that we can only move as fast as the least compliant province. There are many aspects of energy policy that are purely provincial, like regulation over electricity producing utilities. Some other areas have shared federal and provincial roles, such as development of fossil fuel resources. But the tools the federal government already has and does not use would be sufficient to drive much deeper cuts in emissions.

Since 2005, when former Environment Minister Stephane Dion changed the regulations, greenhouse gases have been a listed chemical under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. This means the federal minister already has the power to pass, by regulation, new levels of permissible emissions for GHG from every facility in Canada, just as the feds do for pollution levels from pulp and paper mills or refineries.

Then we have Jason Kenney in his mad flailing against the new US Administration for doing the right thing and canceling a pipeline that would have driven up Canada’s GHG emissions. We should be thanking him. The federal response? Pandering to Alberta once again and ensuring Trudeau’s first phone call with the incoming US president is to complain about Keystone being killed. How embarrassing.

We should be pressing for economic advantage for Alberta, and all of Canada, by setting in motion a bi-lateral set of economic plans for a post-COVID, post-carbon recovery.

Our federal-provincial sensitivities mean that Canada has done much less to deliver on shared climate commitments than have the 27 (post Brexit) separate sovereign nation states of the European Union. That’s right. One federal government, ten provinces and three territories are less capable of pulling together in a shared purpose than are 27 separate nations. The EU is currently 24% below 1990 levels in GHG emissions, while Canada is 21% ABOVE 1990 levels.

Never mind the absurdities of inter-provincial trade barriers on everything from wine to electricity.

Oh Canada!

Whether in a pandemic or a climate emergency, we are not prepared to use the tools we have to act in an emergency for fear of provoking a provincial premier. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we were as concerned that we not offend indigenous governments?

Tomorrow, parliament reconvenes. I hope that there will be all-party agreement to reinstate the rules we had before Christmas to allow virtual debates and votes!

Stay well and stay safe!

Elizabeth

PS

Just a happy note that January 22 was the day that the Treaty to Prohibit Nuclear Weapons became law- without Canada.

Read about my press conference here.

Here’s a lovely idea to plan for Valentine’s Day to cheer up a veteran!

This year, you can encourage Canadians to send a valentine to a Veteran by joining the conversation on social media.

For more information and to get involved, visit veterans.gc.ca

—

You can subscribe to Good Sunday Morning here: Saanich-Gulf Islands Greens

The post Good Sunday Morning – January 24 appeared first on Elizabeth May.

OTTAWA – The Green Party of Canada is concerned by an increase in Canada’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for 2018, as outlined in the national inventory report submitted to the United Nations this week by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC). Canada recorded 729 million tonnes of GHG emissions for 2018, up 15 million tonnes from 2017.

“Obviously during this unprecedented time, when all our efforts must focus on the human health threat posed by COVID-19, it may seem inappropriate to raise climate concerns,” said Green parliamentary leader Elizabeth May (MP, Saanich-Gulf Islands). “But this news, that Canada’s efforts as of the end of 2018 are failing, must be flagged. Given that emissions went up in 2018, our post-COVID climate plans must be far more aggressive. We need to maintain our ‘all hands on deck approach’ to the pandemic to address the climate challenge. We must prioritize investments in a low-carbon recovery.”

ECCC is responsible for developing and reporting reliable, accurate and timely GHG inventories as part of its obligations under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Ms. May points out that under the terms of the Paris Agreement, Canada should have submitted a new emissions target – known as a nationally determined contribution (NDC) – earlier this year. “Even though COP26 has been postponed to 2021, Canada’s improved target is due in 2020. February 9 was the deadline for Canada and other countries to submit their NDCs. Unfortunately, Canada did not meet that deadline and we are now in the midst of a pandemic that is understandably drawing on all our resources. However, to be responsible and bear our fair share, we must reduce our GHGs to 60 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030. I hope that once we are able to refocus our attention back to the climate emergency, all government departments will increase their efforts to incorporate stronger climate adaptation to their portfolios.”

Mission Possible – the Green Climate Action Plan outlines a robust path forward for a just and fair transition to a green economy.

“As we emerge from this pandemic and recovery efforts unfold, a robust plan for a fair and just energy transition will be essential,” said Green Party Interim Leader Jo-Ann Roberts. “ This offers Canadians a real opportunity to invigorate the clean energy sector which will significantly reduce our emissions and enable us to meet the targets set by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This tragic crisis has reminded us of the importance of national and global collaboration. It has also demonstrated the ability of governments to adapt, and provide strong leadership in a crisis situation. We can use this experience as a template of how to move forward and not go back to our old ways of doing things.”

# # #

For more information or to arrange an interview:

Rosie Emery

Press Secretary

613-562-4916 ext, 204

rosie.emery@greenparty.ca

The post Greens disturbed by latest report on Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions appeared first on Elizabeth May.

The post A statement condemning proposed carbon tax break for big greenhouse gas emitters appeared first on Elizabeth May.

“This report has nothing to do with the crisis of climate change and in no way vindicates the Conservatives and their anti-environment policies of the past six years,” said Ms. May.

“As Scott Vaughan, Canada’s highly respected Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, noted two weeks ago, the NPRI actually exempts releases from oil and gas exploration and development. How then can Mr. Kent and others claim the report’s figures justify their pro-extraction policies?”

The report also contains no emission information regarding hundreds of thousands of hydraulic fracturing – or fracking – projects across the country. “Not only are Canadians being kept from the truth about the toxic chemicals used in this process, but we are being prevented from knowing the full impact of fracking on the environment and climate,” Ms. May noted.

The Conservatives are also trying to take credit for a decrease in lead, mercury, and cadmium levels, but this is not due to any recent federal policy changes.

The post Conservatives’ Attempts to Take Credit for Emission Decreases Unwarranted appeared first on Elizabeth May.