Amendments to Bill C-45

Bill C-45: A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures

Motion No. 28 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting lines 12 and 13 on page 14.

Motion No. 29 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 15 with the following:

“before 2020, or”

Motion No. 74 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 35 with the following:

“(a.1) 19.98% of the amount by which the”

Motion No. 239 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing lines 23 to 27 on page 204 with the following:

“or any of its members in accordance with any treaty or land claims agreement or, consistent with inherent Aboriginal right, harvested by an Aboriginal organization or any of its members for traditional uses, including for food, social or ceremonial purposes;”

Motion No. 249 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 208 the following:

“(3) The exemptions set out in subsection (1) apply if the person who proposes the construction of the bridge, parkway or any related work establishes, in relation to any work, undertaking or activity for the purpose of the construction of the bridge, parkway or any related work, that the work, undertaking or activity

(a) will not impede navigation;

(b) will not cause destruction of fish or harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat within the meaning of the Fisheries Act; and

(c) will not jeopardize the survival or recovery of a species listed in the Species at Risk Act.

Motion No. 250 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 17 on page 208 the following:

“(3) The exemption set out in subsection (1) applies if the person who proposes the construction of the bridge, parkway or any related work establishes, in relation to any work, undertaking or activity for the purpose of that construction, that the construction will not present a risk of net negative environmental impact.”

Motion No. 342 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 260 the following:

“12.2 Within six months after the day on which regulations made under subsection 12.1(8) come into force, the impact of section 12.1 and those regulations on privacy rights must be assessed and reported to each House of Parliament.”

Motion No. 351 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 274, be amended by adding after line 38 on page 262 the following:

“(3) The council shall, within four months after the end of each year, submit to the Minister a report on the activities of the council during that year.

(4) The Minister shall cause a copy of the report to be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days after the day on which the Minister receives it.

(5) The Minister shall send a copy of the report to the lieutenant governor of each province immediately after a copy of the report is last laid before either House.

(6) For the purpose of this section, “sitting day” means a day on which either House of Parliament sits.”

Motion No. 352 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 275.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 353 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 276.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 360 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 279, be amended

(a) by replacing line 3 on page 265 with the following:

“47. (1) The Minister may, following public consultation, designate any”

(b) by replacing lines 8 to 15 on page 265 with the following:

“specified in this Act, exercise the powers and perform the”

Motion No. 381 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 302, be amended by replacing lines 4 to 8 on page 271 with the following:

“9. (1) Except in instances where a province is pursuing any of the legitimate objectives referred to in Article 404 of the Agreement, namely public security and safety, public order, protection of human, animal or plant life or health, protection of the environment, consumer protection, protection of the health, safety and well-being of workers, and affirmative action programs for disadvantaged groups, the Governor in Council may, by order, for the purpose of suspending benefits of equivalent effect or imposing retaliatory measures of equivalent effect in respect of a province under Article 1709 of the Agreement, do any”

Motion No. 383 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 307, be amended

(a) by replacing line 5 on page 272 with the following:

“or less

(a) for 2011, the Minister shall refund the”

(b) by replacing line 15 on page 272 with the following:

“(b) for 2012, the Minister shall refund to the employer a portion of the premium for 2013 determined by the following formula if that amount is more than $2:

P2 – P1

where

P1 is the amount of the employer’s premium in 2012; and

P2 is the amount of the employer’s premium in 2013; and

(c) for 2013, the Minister shall refund to the employer a portion of the premium for 2014 determined by the following formula if that amount is more than $2:

P2 – P1

where

P1 is the amount of the employer’s premium in 2013; and

P2 is the amount of the employer’s premium in 2014.

(8.92) For the purposes of paragraph (8.91)(a),”

Motion No. 384 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 307, be amended by replacing line 19 on page 272 with the following:

“not exceed $2,000.”

Motion No. 386 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 272 with the following:

“national in respect of whom there is reason to believe that he or she poses a specific and credible security threat must, before entering Canada, apply”

Motion No. 388 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 273 the following:

“(1.02) The Minister shall cause a copy of each proposed regulation made under subsection (1.01) to be laid before each House of Parliament, and each House shall refer the proposed regulation to the appropriate committee of that House.

(1.03) A regulation may not be made before the earliest of

(a) 30 sitting days after the proposed regulation is laid before Parliament,

(b) 160 calendar days after the proposed regulation is laid before Parliament, and

(c) the day after the day on which each appropriate committee has reported its findings with respect to the proposed regulation.

(1.04) The Minister shall take into account any report of the committee of either House. If a regulation does not incorporate a recommendation of the committee of either House, the Minister shall lay before that House a statement of the reasons for not incorporating it.

(1.05) A proposed regulation that has been laid before Parliament need not again be so laid prior to the making of the regulation, whether it has been altered or not.”

Motion No. 389 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 273 with the following:

“system or officer, and any personal information relating to the authorization may only be disclosed in accordance with the Privacy Act.”

Motion No. 390 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 273 the following:

“(1.02) No private security company shall be involved in the collection, dissemination, retention or disposal of private information obtained for the purposes of the electronic authorization system referred to in subsection (1.01).”

Motion No. 391 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 309.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 392 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 309, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 273 the following:

“(4) Within six months after the day on which the regulations relating to electronic travel authorizations referred to in subsection 11(1.01) come into force, the impact of such authorizations on privacy rights must be assessed and the assessment reported to each House of Parliament.”

Motion No. 393 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 309, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 273 the following:

“(4) Regulations relating to electronic authorizations referred to in subsection 11(1.01) shall not be made earlier than two years of the coming into force of this subsection to allow for consultation with the tourism industry and other interested parties to assess the potential impact of the regulations on that industry.”

Motion No. 395 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 311.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — November 27, 2012

Motion No. 396 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 311, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 273 with the following:

“subsections 11(1) and (1.01), other than those for which an authorization is issued by the system and those”

Motion No. 397 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 311, be amended by adding after line 33 on page 273 the following:

“(1.01) This section ceases to have effect with respect to electronic travel authorizations referred to in subsection 11(1.01) at the end of the fifteenth sitting day of Parliament after December 31, 2016 unless, before the end of that day, the application of this section is extended by a resolution passed, by both Houses of Parliament, that this section continues to be in force.”

Motion No. 398 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 312.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 401 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 313, be amended by deleting lines 15 to 24 on page 274.

Motion No. 409 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 317, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the following:

“(7) Section 2 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 2(1) and is amended by adding the following:

(2) For the purposes of this Act, when considering if a decision is in the public interest, the Minister shall consider whether it would protect the public right of navigation, including the exercise of that right.”

Motion No. 411 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 277 with the following:

“navigable water”

Motion No. 412 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by deleting line 32 on page 277 to line 15 on page 278.

Motion No. 413 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 278 with the following:

“navigable water”

Motion No. 417 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 279 the following:

“(f) the importance of that navigable water to Aboriginal people for traditional and other uses. ”

Motion No. 418 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 279 the following:

“(4.1) For the purposes of this Act, a bridge, boom, dam or causeway is deemed to have been determined by the Minister to be a work that substantially interferes with navigation.”

Motion No. 421 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 38 on page 279 the following:

“(10) All works that the Minister has determined under this section are likely to substantially interfere with navigation are deemed to be physical activities designated by regulations made under paragraph 84(a) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 and linked to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.”

Motion No. 422 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 280 the following:

“(2.1) If the Minister did not require from the owner the deposit of information and publication of a notice under paragraph 5(6)(b), the Minister must require from the owner the deposit of the plans of the proposed work, of a description of the proposed site and of any other information specified by the Minister in the local land registry or land titles office or in any other place specified by the Minister and the publication of a notice containing the information in the Canada Gazette and in two newspapers published in or near the locality where the proposed work is to be constructed.

(2.2) The notice referred to in subsection (2.1) shall invite any interested person to provide written comments to the Minister within 30 days after its publication.”

Motion No. 424 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 42 on page 279 with the following:

“navigable water that”

Motion No. 425 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 281 with the following:

“any navigable water”

Motion No. 426 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 282 with the following:

“navigable water that”

Motion No. 427 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 282 with the following:

“or across any navigable water only if the construction, placement,”

Motion No. 428 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 283 with the following:

“shall immediately”

Motion No. 429 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 6 and 7 on page 284 with the following:

“through or across any navigable water to repair, alter or remove it”

Motion No. 430 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 284 with the following:

“water — shall”

Motion No. 431 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 15 on page 285 with the following:

“— to secure,”

Motion No. 432 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 285 with the following:

“minor water — or”

Motion No. 434 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 319, be amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 286 with the following:

“than in any minor water — so that, in the Minister’s opinion, it”

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 436 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 320, be amended by replacing lines 11 to 13 on page 287 with the following:

“abandoned in any navigable water, other than in any minor water, the Minister may, under the restric-”

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 438 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by deleting lines 23 to 30 on page 288.

Motion No. 439 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 15 to 17 on page 289 with the following:

“through or across any navigable waters, other than any minor waters;”

Motion No. 440 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 290 with the following:

“(a) designating any works, other than bridges, booms, dams and causeways, as minor works;”

Motion No. 441 — November 27, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 11 and 12 on page 290 with the following:

“navigable waters, in whole or in part, other than a river that is part of the Canadian Heritage Rivers System or that provides habitat for any wildlife species at risk set out in Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act;”

Motion No. 442 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 17 to 19 on page 290 with the following:

“through or across any navigable waters, other than minor waters; and”

Motion No. 443 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after line 24 on page 290 the following:

“(2.1) Before making any order under paragraph (2)(a), the Minister shall assess the likely environmental effects of those works.

(2.2) Before making any order under paragraph (2)(b), the Minister shall take into account

(a) the ecological value of that navigable water;

(b) the utility of that navigable water for the purposes of fishing and hunting; and

(c) the importance of that navigable water to Aboriginal people for traditional and other uses.

(2.3) The Minister shall post a summary of the assessments made under subsections (2.1) and (2.2) on the Internet site of the Department of Transport.”

Motion No. 444 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 31 to 36 on page 290 with the following:

“28.1 (1) The Minister must table, in each House of Parliament, every order that he or she proposes to make under paragraphs 28(2)(a) and (b).

(2) Each proposed order that is tabled before a House must, on the day it is tabled, be referred by that House to an appropriate committee of that House, as determined by the rules of that House, and the committee may conduct inquiries or public hearings with respect to the proposed order and report its findings to that House.

(3) A proposed order that has been tabled pursuant to subsection (1) may be made

(a) on the expiration of 30 sitting days after it was last tabled in either House; or

(b) if, with respect to each House,

(i) the committee reports to the House, or

(ii) the committee decides not to conduct inquiries or public hearings.

(4) For the purpose of this section, “sitting day” means a day on which either House sits.”

Motion No. 445 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 21 on page 291.

Motion No. 449 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 43 on page 291.

Motion No. 458 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 294 the following:

“RIGHT OF ACTION

39.01 An individual whose right of navigation in respect of any navigable waters has been interfered with, or will likely be interfered with, may bring a claim for relief in public nuisance without the consent of the Attorney General and without establishing special damages.”

Motion No. 461 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 331.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 463 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 332, be amended by deleting lines 19 to 33 on page 301.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 483 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 352.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 485 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 354.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 488 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 357.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 490 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 309 with the following:

“reinspection of the grain, to the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain”

Motion No. 492 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 309 with the following:

“appeal is given to the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain inspector for”

Motion No. 494 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 309 with the following:

“41. (1) If an appeal is taken, the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain”

Motion No. 495 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 309 with the following:

“(2) The decision of the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain inspector”

Motion No. 496 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 309 with the following:

“conferred on him or her under subsection (1) provided that it is demonstrated that the delegate has no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the outcome of the appeal.”

Motion No. 500 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 362, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 310 with the following:

“provide a security, in the form of a bond, for the purpose of”

Motion No. 502 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 363, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 310 with the following:

“provided a security as required by subsection”

Motion No. 503 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 363, be amended by replacing line 40 on page 310 with the following:

“provided a security as required by subsection”

Motion No. 505 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 364, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 311 with the following:

“believe that any security provided by a licensee”

Motion No. 506 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 364, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 311 with the following:

“provided by a licensee, and the security may be”

Motion No. 512 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing lines 37 and 38 on page 313 with the following:

“terminal elevator shall submit grain received into the elevator for an official weighing, in a manner authorized by the”

Motion No. 513 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 314 with the following:

“authorized by the Commission who has been demonstrated to have no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the grain and chosen”

Motion No. 514 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 314 with the following:

“authorized by the Commission who has been demonstrated to have no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the grain and chosen by”

Motion No. 515 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended

(a) by replacing line 40 on page 314 with the following:

“the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain inspector for Canada for a”

(b) by replacing line 44 on page 314 with the following:

“prescribed portion of them, to the grain appeal tribunal for the Division or the chief grain”

Motion No. 516 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 315 with the following:

“section provided that it is demonstrated that the delegate has no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the decision.”

Motion No. 517 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended

(a) by replacing lines 19 and 20 on page 316 with the following:

“70.2 (1) An operator of a licensed”

(b) by replacing lines 23 and 24 on page 316 with the following:

“third party or cause it to be officially”

Motion No. 518 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 316 with the following:

“Commission and chosen by the operator. A third party may not be authorized unless it is demonstrated that it has no direct or indirect interest, financial or otherwise, in the outcome of the weighing or inspection.”

Motion No. 525 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 376.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 526 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 377.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:

Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) and Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants) —November 26, 2012

Motion No. 662 — November 26, 2012 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Schedule 2.