Elizabeth May: Mr. Speaker, I would also like to thank my colleague for his speech.
I agree with all the points he raised. We really do need more transparency in the RCMP, especially in light of what Mr. Kennedy, the former RCMP public complaints commissioner, had to say.
Can my colleague tell us why the Conservatives oppose these very important and wise amendments, which were even supported by experts?
Jamie Nicholls: Mr. Speaker, my colleague from Saanich—Gulf Islands raises an excellent point.
We proposed reasonable amendments. We were elected to the House in 2011 to work together. That is what we promised Canadians.
When the committee heard the evidence of experts on a number of incidents involving the RCMP, such as the Robert Dziekanski case and sexual harassment incidents, it was clear that the RCMP should have dealt with the problem internally because there was the opportunity to do so.
In response to my colleague’s question, I would say that the Conservatives did not listen to our reasonable suggestions, which were supported by the experts. They did not want to improve their own bill simply because they are afraid of being weak and being seen as weak if they accept our suggestions.
Canadians want all MPs to work together to come up with bills that make sense, solve problems and move our country forward, rather than playing politics at committees and not accepting suggested amendments.
I do not know why the Conservatives are so opposed to the opposition’s reasonable suggestions.